you're reading...

Life as an Economic Decision

Two opinions on life. One at the beginning, one at the end. They’re remarkably similar.

On birth:

In a Recession, Abortions are Not a Bad Choice

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog


The recession is driving American demand for contraception. And for abortions. The media have been rife this past week with stories about the rising number of couples and single mothers doing the math and deciding this is no time to bring a child into the world—not when the economy is depressed, jobs are scarce, and family incomes are dropping.

The media have also been rife with stories portraying this trend as something of a tragedy. Let me propose a counter view: It is not.

The Associated Press ran a story on March 25 that read as follows:

The pregnant woman showed up at the medical centre in flip-flops and in tears, after walking there to save bus fare.

Her boyfriend had lost his job, she told her doctor in Oakland, Calif., and now—fearing harder times for her family—she wanted to abort what would have been her fourth child.

“This was a desired pregnancy—she’d been getting prenatal care—but they re-evaluated expenses and decided not to continue,” said Dr. Pratima Gupta. “When I was doing the options counseling, she interrupted me halfway through, crying, and said, ‘Dr. Gupta, I just walked here for an hour. I’m sure of my decision.'”

Yes, it’s sad that this unwed, pregnant mother of three had no money for bus fare. It’s terrible that her boyfriend lost his job. It is heart-wrenching that she fell to tears in the doctor’s office. But in the long run, can we not agree that an unwed couple’s decision not to bring a fourth child into the world when they are having trouble feeding themselves and three children is no tragedy? It’s actually a fact-based, rational decision that in the end benefits the three children they already have and society as well.

Feeding and raising children is expensive. Tuition may be free at public schools but there are still books, transportation, food, clothes, medical care and activities that add up—way up. One may assume this family of five is struggling just to maintain its basics: housing and food. Add one more child and those costs rise as income drops. It’s no tragedy: it’s a good decision. The decision benefits society in two ways. It allows the couple to focus more time, energy and resources on their three children, giving each child a better life and a better chance of growing up to contribute to society. It also lessens the chance the family will have to rely on scarce public resources (food stamps, TANF) to raise their children.

On death:

What does Mr Minelli say about who should be able to get help killing themselves?

Simon Cox: Pretty much anyone who he says has mental capacity, he believes that they should be allowed to have an assisted suicide. The debate here has tended to focus on terminally ill people, he said this was actually a British obsession.


Simon Interviewing: Is what you would ultimately like, the right to have assisted suicide no matter who you are, whether you’re seriously ill or not?

Ludwig Minelli: Is without condition, a right, a human right is without any condition, except capacity of discernment. I have a totally different attitude to suicide. I say suicide is a marvellous possibility given to a human being.

Simon Cox: Absolutely, the debate here is centred often on the ethics or individual cases and someone’s own personal suffering, but Mr Minelli thinks if we opened up assisted suicide here and made it legal the NHS could actually save money.

Ludwig Minelli: For 50 suicide attempts you have one suicide and the others are failing with heavy costs to the National Health Service. If we would have another attitude to suicide, saying suicide is a very good possibility to escape. In many many cases they are terribly hurt afterwards sometimes you have to put them in institutions for 50 years. Very costly . . .

Simon interviewing: And you have carried out assisted suicides of mental health patients haven’t you?

Ludwig Minelli: Yes we have, of course.

Life isn’t worth much these days. Not when it’s reduced to an economic decision, when abortions happen because a mother can’t afford to feed the child, when suicide is a “marvelous possibility” that should be promoted because failed attempts are costly.

Human life isn’t always convenient and neat and clean and easy. But it’s life, created in the image of God, with a soul that will endure forever. And that means it’s much more than just another factor in the plus or minus column when you’re balancing the checkbook.

Life. We should love it, protect it, preserve it, from beginning to end.



No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: